According to @LexSokolin, Ethereum is technologically highly decentralized but its future requires centralized and opinionated planning by pro‑Ethereum leaders, warning that without structural change the model may become unviable in about five years; source: Lex Sokolin on X, Oct 17, 2025. This frames a five‑year governance execution risk window for ETH that traders can integrate into risk assessment and exposure management; source: Lex Sokolin on X, Oct 17, 2025. Traders should monitor any signals of structural governance changes and coordinated planning from key ecosystem participants, including the perspective he endorsed from @ajwarner90; source: Lex Sokolin on X, Oct 17, 2025.

According to @jih2nn, accessibility to context-rich meeting summaries from Ethereum working group members is more useful than raw information for keeping up with how Ethereum ETH discussions move forward. Source: Jihoon Song @jih2nn on X, Oct 11, 2025. @jih2nn states that AI-generated summaries have never been up to par compared with human context from those inside the working group. Source: Jihoon Song @jih2nn on X, Oct 11, 2025. He adds that warm endorsement from @poojaranjan19 and a shoutout from @christine_dkim reinforced his commitment to producing such summaries. Source: Jihoon Song @jih2nn on X, Oct 11, 2025. He encourages EIP champions and contributors like @tcoratger to share informed summaries to help the broader community keep up, describing this as a big win for Ethereum. Source: Jihoon Song @jih2nn on X, Oct 11, 2025.

According to Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum's community should explore various perspectives on governance, including raw ETH holders, proof of personhood, and potentially the protocol guild. Understanding these viewpoints could impact trading strategies, as governance changes may affect Ethereum's market dynamics (source: VitalikButerin).